Короткий опис (реферат):
В статті розглянуто питання гендерної рівності працівників прокуратури України. Зроблено наголос на необхідності пропорційного збільшення кількості жінок в керівництві Прокуратури України. Проведено порівняльний аналіз кількісних характеристик гендерних проблем проходження служби в органах прокуратури Європейських країн. Детально проаналізовані атрибути (формений одяг, герб) прокуратури. Зроблені наголоси на зміну прорадянської атрибутики сучасної прокуратури України. The article discusses the issues of gender equality of the employees of the Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine. The emphasis was made on the need to proportionally increase the number of women in the leadership of the Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine. A comparative analysis of the quantitative characteristics of gender issues of service in the prosecuting authorities of Europe. Attributes (uniforms, coat of arms) of the prosecutor's office are analyzed in detail. Accents are made to change the Soviet attributes of the modern prosecutor's office of Ukraine. Integrations of Ukraine to European community, and swift socio–political transformations are related to it, stipulate the fundamental changes of conceptual bases of vital functions of modern society and efficiency of realization of state administration, require urgent reformation of the law-enforcement system on the whole and services of office of public prosecutor, in particular, substantial improvement of organization of institute of passing of service and optimization of activity of skilled potential of office of public prosecutor of Ukraine. In the same time, reformation of organs of office of public prosecutor did not remove gender asymmetry in a skilled public prosecutor's vehicle, external attributes are left, that called to symbolize setting of office of public prosecutor, as law–enforcement identification, that in end–point results in her negative estimations in society. The aim of the article is an analysis of reasons of gender asymmetry during passing serve in the organs of office of public prosecutor of Ukraine and the critical cut of existent external attribute that in opinion of author quite not answers the queries of democratization of society and real social setting of office of public prosecutor. Separate attention is deserved by abandonment of our state from symbolism and attribute in the organs of office of public prosecutor, in particular from one–stem obviously "promultural" manner, id est in the spirit of military uniiform with all by distinctive regalias. However, the complete substituting of form by a civilian dress, to our opinion, will not assist the increase of authority of office of public prosecutor.
